Todos os relatórios
#49340: "Tournament creates too many tables with minimum player count"
implemented: Esta sugestão foi implementada
1
Sobre o que é este relatório?
website BGA
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Sugestão: na minha opinião, o ponto seguinte melhoraria imensamente o website
Descrição detalhada
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
When creating a tournament for a multiplayer game, you can specify two quantities: the Number of Players in a Match and the Number of Players in a Match (minimum). When the tournament starts, it should create tables so that all players are playing (if possible) and most of the tables have the desired player count, not the minimum player count. Yet in many tournaments, I have seen that the algorithm creates far too many tables with the minimum (undesired) player count. A detailed example is below.• Qual navegador você está usando?
Mozilla v5
Histórico do relatório
27 set 2021 16:59 • blockmonoid • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
An example tournament: boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=89107
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
31 jan 2023 11:16 • Archduke • Esta sugestão foi implementada:
Implemented (release notes: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=133530#p133530)
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
Por favor, adicione aqui qualquer coisa que pareça relevante para a reprodução deste bug ou o entendimento de sua sugestão:
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
