Todos os relatórios
Zookeepers relatórios
#124258: "No actions"
implemented: Esta sugestão foi implementada
1
Sobre o que é este relatório?
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Sugestão: Na minha opinião, o que sugiro a seguir poderia melhorar muito a implementação do jogo
Descrição detalhada
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
My opponent was somehow able click his way into a situation when he had 0 resources AND he fired all the keepers along with the animals that he had saved, thus leaving him with no means of gaining more resources.
I am sure all the moves were legal and nobody would probably do that in a physical game, but in a digital game a player can be left with essential no moves.
An option will be a warning before a player discard their last keeper with saved animals?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v125
Histórico do relatório
18 mai 2024 7:21 • parsonii • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
18 mai 2024 17:13 • Fearinn • Os desenvolvedores concordam que é uma boa ideia e pretendem trabalhar nisso:
We've antecipated this scenario. It should've been blocked by an error, so this is actually a bug. I'm gonna investigate it, thanks!
18 mai 2024 20:15 • Fearinn • Esta sugestão foi implementada:
After some investigation, I'm almost certain there was no bug. What most likely happened is that your opponent quit the match when he had 1 resource in hand. When a player quits, all their resources are returned to the bag. As his turns will be automatically skipped, there would be no actions anyway.
I've just added a message to make it more clear when that's the case.
Please let me know if you have any info that indicates I'm wrong.
I've just added a message to make it more clear when that's the case.
Please let me know if you have any info that indicates I'm wrong.
18 mai 2024 20:43 • parsonii • Esta sugestão foi implementada:
You are right. He did have one resource remaining when he quit the game. But one white resource would not allow him to save an animal and he had no means of gaining more resources to get himself out of that situation.
I am really thinking more along the line that the game needs to have a situation that will prevent that or some mechanism for a player to potentially dig themselves out of that hole. Maybe gain min 1 resource or a rule that a player may not discard the last keeper with animal saved.
In either case, it's more a game mechanism than the implementation. Thank you for looking into it. :)
I am really thinking more along the line that the game needs to have a situation that will prevent that or some mechanism for a player to potentially dig themselves out of that hole. Maybe gain min 1 resource or a rule that a player may not discard the last keeper with animal saved.
In either case, it's more a game mechanism than the implementation. Thank you for looking into it. :)
18 mai 2024 22:39 • Fearinn • Esta sugestão foi implementada:
One white resource would allow him to save an animal, due to the conservation fund rule (1 white = 2 red/green). As long as the implementation works as expected, the players will never become unable to continue the match.
That doesn't mean they can't put themselves in very bad situations, but I guess that's part of the game.
That doesn't mean they can't put themselves in very bad situations, but I guess that's part of the game.
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
Por favor, adicione aqui qualquer coisa que pareça relevante para a reprodução deste bug ou o entendimento de sua sugestão:
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
