• Por favor copie e cole a mensagem de erro que aparece na tela, se possível.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Por favor explique o que queria fazer, o que fez e o que aconteceu

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se você tiver uma captura de tela desse bug (boa prática), pode usar um serviço de hospedagem de imagens de sua escolha (por exemplo, snipboard.io) para enviá-la e copiar/colar o link aqui. Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• O que estava presente na tela quando você estava bloqueado (tela em branco? Parte da imagem do jogo? Mensagem de erro?)

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Que parte das regras não foi respeitada pela adaptação do BGA?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• A violação de regras está visível na revisão do jogo? Se sim, em que número de jogada?

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Qual era a ação de jogo que queria fazer?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• O que você tentou fazer para provocar esta ação de jogo?

• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer isto(mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Em que passo do jogo ocorre o problema(qual era a instrução corrente do jogo)?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer essa ação de jogo (mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Por favor descreva o problema de visualização. Se você tiver uma captura de tela desse bug (boa prática), pode usar um serviço de hospedagem de imagens de sua escolha (por exemplo, snipboard.io) para enviá-la e copiar/colar o link aqui.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se você tiver uma captura de tela desse bug (boa prática), pode usar um serviço de hospedagem de imagens de sua escolha (por exemplo, snipboard.io) para enviá-la e copiar/colar o link aqui. Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual navegador você está usando?

• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual navegador você está usando?