Todos os relatórios
The Gnomes of Zavandor relatórios
#77727: "Some statistics would be great to improve the own strategy"
implemented: Esta sugestão foi implementada
2
Sobre o que é este relatório?
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Sugestão: Na minha opinião, o que sugiro a seguir poderia melhorar muito a implementação do jogo
Descrição detalhada
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
After playing TGOZ several times here on BGA we found out that it would be great to know some statistics to improve the own strategy.
The following statistics would be great to have:
- total number of moves per player (it is a big difference if you buy a Gnomunculus at beginning or at the end of the game...)
- how often did the player "take 4 gold" (per player)
- time divided by total number of moves (per player) (if you have a Gnomunculus you have more time!)
- max. spreading between actual costs for gem type x and gem type y (spreading = difference between actual cost of type x and type y --> max. spreading is max. difference which ever happened in the game)
and which were the type x and type y (e.g. max. spreading between emerald and diamond = 12). Note: It is NOT required to know the spreading between all types of gems, but just the maximum!
- average of max. spreading: spreading must be calculated once every round, i.e. after the mining phase. These values have to be added every round. At the end the average can be calculated by division: total sum/no. of mining phases
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Mozilla 16.0.1
Histórico do relatório
20 dez 2022 9:53 • stefano • Esta sugestão foi implementada:
- total number of moves per player --> Added
- how often did the player "take 4 gold" (per player) --> Added
- time divided by total number of moves (per player) --> Not possible, I cannot make statistics on the time. BGA does some default ones, but I can't
- max. spreading between actual costs for gem type x and gem type y --> Not possible. Stats can be only integer or float values, not string. So I cannot show the gem type min and max
- average of max. spreading: spreading must be calculated once every round, i.e. after the mining phase. --> Not possible. Stats can be only integer or float values, not string. So I cannot show the gem type min and max
- how often did the player "take 4 gold" (per player) --> Added
- time divided by total number of moves (per player) --> Not possible, I cannot make statistics on the time. BGA does some default ones, but I can't
- max. spreading between actual costs for gem type x and gem type y --> Not possible. Stats can be only integer or float values, not string. So I cannot show the gem type min and max
- average of max. spreading: spreading must be calculated once every round, i.e. after the mining phase. --> Not possible. Stats can be only integer or float values, not string. So I cannot show the gem type min and max
20 dez 2022 21:48 • PickAPig • Esta sugestão foi implementada:
Thanks for implementation!
Regarding the spreading: I think it is a misunderstanding because of my bad description...
The needed value is only an integer value :-)
It is not required to know what type of gem it was. x and y are just variables for the 4 gem types. It should be something like this:
for (x=0; x<4; x++)
{
for (y=0; y<4; y++)
{
diff = actual_costs[x] - actual_costs[y];
if (diff < 0 )
diff = - diff;
if ( diff > max_spreading )
max_spreading = diff;
}
}
Is this a better description?
Regarding the spreading: I think it is a misunderstanding because of my bad description...
The needed value is only an integer value :-)
It is not required to know what type of gem it was. x and y are just variables for the 4 gem types. It should be something like this:
for (x=0; x<4; x++)
{
for (y=0; y<4; y++)
{
diff = actual_costs[x] - actual_costs[y];
if (diff < 0 )
diff = - diff;
if ( diff > max_spreading )
max_spreading = diff;
}
}
Is this a better description?
20 dez 2022 22:23 • PickAPig • Esta sugestão foi implementada:
So from my point of view max. spreading (integer) and average of max. spreading (float) should be possible
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
Por favor, adicione aqui qualquer coisa que pareça relevante para a reprodução deste bug ou o entendimento de sua sugestão:
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
