Todos os relatórios
website BGA
#19843: "Either disable "conceed" option OR allow to end the game after conceeding"
Sobre o que é este relatório?
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Sugestão: na minha opinião, o ponto seguinte melhoraria imensamente o website
Descrição detalhada
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
As a Seasons player, I find VERY frustrating when an opponent conceed the game near the end. When we work hard on a draft and cannot play it, it removes all the fun of the game. To me, it's actually highly unfair-play to do that.
To fix this frustration, I see 2 options:
- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game• Qual navegador você está usando?
Not relevant
Histórico do relatório
26 jun 2020 12:32 •
compte obelète • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
26 jun 2020 16:35 •
Niluje • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
30 jun 2020 13:52 • My last 40 Seasons game: 7 conceed: 86%, 60%, 97%, 86%, 77%, 100%, 97%
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
Wicksweff • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
2 dez 2020 18:55 • When you agree to a game, you should be agreeing to play it to completion.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
jda • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
3 dez 2020 1:16 • I agree the current system is frustrating. Changing it to offer to concede would be good.
Maeves • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
22 mar 2021 12:06 • i agree, you are thinking of your next move, and without notice, the game end because of conceed.
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
KongKing123 • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
24 mar 2021 19:14 • No thanks. Forcing someone to play out a lost game just for your enjoyment is not the way to go.
Wicksweff • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
27 nov 2022 13:46 • If you agree to the game, you play to the end.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
ufm • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
27 nov 2022 15:58 • Qutting is equivalent to flipping the board. Not conceding.
ufm • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
27 nov 2022 16:05 • Conceding literally means 'admitting their defeat', not flipping the board or ragequitting. The game has ended.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
Cos- • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
20 dez 2023 2:05 • I strongly favor the last option: Allow remaining player to finish the game if someone concedes.
pecan • Esta sugestão ainda não foi analisada pelos desenvolvedores:
3 fev 2024 9:29 • For me, we have option to resign is the biggest advantage of 2-player game.
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
Por favor, adicione aqui qualquer coisa que pareça relevante para a reprodução deste bug ou o entendimento de sua sugestão:
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.