#14241: "ARENA mode players should be anonymous in team games, until the end of the game."
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Por favor, cheque se já há um report com o mesmo assunto
Se sim, por favor, VOTE para este report. Reports com mais votos recebem PRIORIDADE!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Descrição detalhada
• Por favor copie e cole a mensagem de erro que aparece na tela, se possível.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Por favor explique o que queria fazer, o que fez e o que aconteceu
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• O que estava presente no ecrã/tela quando ficou bloqueado (Ecrã/tela em branco? Parte da imagem de jogo? Mensagem de erro?)
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Que parte das regras não foi respeitada pela adaptação do BGA?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• A violação de regras está visível na revisão do jogo? Se sim, em que número de jogada?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Qual era a acção de jogo que queria fazer?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• O que tenta fazer para provocar esta acção de jogo?
• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer isto(mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Em que passo do jogo ocorre o problema(qual era a instrução corrente do jogo)?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer uma acção de jogo(mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Por favor descreva o problema de visualização. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Qual navegador você está usando?
Irrelevant
Histórico do relatório
Now, it is also not normally a problem to make a move on a "Turn Based" game and to go back to the start page, but in this instance, the person whom I was playing was online, and we began to play the game in real time. The next problem that occurred is that there is no prompt that an automatic "Real Time" game, whether "Arena Mode" or not, has started when you are currently playing another "Turn Based" game. If it is a "Simple Mode" game, then the game just won't start. However, if it is an "Arena Mode" game, it starts automatically, you are removed from the game, and receive penalties for abandoning the game.
I am including a screenshot of the notice that I received of my loss in Battle Sheep as soon as I finished my game of Nine Men's Morris.
imgur.com/a/rlUF4xm
There was no way for me to know that the game began, until I had already lost.
One of the primary goals of "Arena Mode" play is to foster an environment where people play games more freely. I assume that is the reason that players are not allowed to leave "Arena Mode" games. To prevent players from being able to screen their opponents.
There is, however, an alternative. If the names of players were not displayed until the game actually begins, then players would not be able to screen their opponents. This would allow the standard "Real-Time" game features to be implemented in "Arena Mode."
Currently for "Real-Time" games, if a player does not start the game, there is no penalty, because the game does not start. The same could be done in "Arena Mode." If a player does not choose to start their game within a short time period, they could be replaced with the next available player. If there are no other available players, then the table could just wait for the player to return.
Now, the other players also should not be penalized, if this turns out to be an extended period of time, so all players should be prompted to start the game again, if it takes more than a minute for the game to begin.
That is how I feel the problem should be resolved, but in the mean time, if you allow a player to go to a "Turn Based" game from the "Play Now" page with pending "Real Time" games, you would either prompt to cancel the games, or open the "Turn Based" game in a new tab.
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.