#113762: "Speed up asynchronous play"
Sobre o que é este relatório?
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Por favor, cheque se já há um report com o mesmo assunto
Se sim, por favor, VOTE para este report. Reports com mais votos recebem PRIORIDADE!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Descrição detalhada
-
• Por favor copie e cole a mensagem de erro que aparece na tela, se possível.
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• Por favor explique o que queria fazer, o que fez e o que aconteceu
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• O que estava presente na tela quando você estava bloqueado (tela em branco? Parte da imagem do jogo? Mensagem de erro?)
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Que parte das regras não foi respeitada pela adaptação do BGA?
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• A violação de regras está visível na revisão do jogo? Se sim, em que número de jogada?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Qual era a ação de jogo que queria fazer?
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• O que você tentou fazer para provocar esta ação de jogo?
-
• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer isto(mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Em que passo do jogo ocorre o problema(qual era a instrução corrente do jogo)?
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer essa ação de jogo (mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Por favor descreva o problema de visualização. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v120
Histórico do relatório
2. Make sense
Currently, it looks like:
Player A income
Player B income
Player C income
Player A pay for authority
Player B pay for authority
Player C pay for authority
It would be half as many async turns if it instead was
Player A income, player A pay for authority
Player B income, player B pay for authority
Player C income, player C pay for authority
That's what I'm saying in item 1, not that it should be simultaneous (although I also think it should just be simultaneous)
Final remark regarding the aspect of simultaneous play, specifically for structures P3, P5, and P7, it's apparent that enabling simultaneous action is not feasible. This is due to the fact that certain rewards, such as receiving a deep space tile (with a military academy), a medal (with a transporter), or other items, are contingent on turn order. Attempting to differentiate based on which structures are in play could lead to confusion and complexity in implementation. Moreover, it's highly probable that such an approach might introduce additional issues and instability into the game.
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.