#24670: "After Mayhem, multiple bricks should be eligible to fall"
Sobre o que é este relatório?
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Por favor, cheque se já há um report com o mesmo assunto
Se sim, por favor, VOTE para este report. Reports com mais votos recebem PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrição detalhada
-
• Por favor copie e cole a mensagem de erro que aparece na tela, se possível.
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. -
• Por favor explique o que queria fazer, o que fez e o que aconteceu
72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. -
• Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• O que estava presente na tela quando você estava bloqueado (tela em branco? Parte da imagem do jogo? Mensagem de erro?)
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Que parte das regras não foi respeitada pela adaptação do BGA?
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. -
• A violação de regras está visível na revisão do jogo? Se sim, em que número de jogada?
72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Qual era a ação de jogo que queria fazer?
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. -
• O que você tentou fazer para provocar esta ação de jogo?
72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.
-
• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer isto(mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Em que passo do jogo ocorre o problema(qual era a instrução corrente do jogo)?
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. -
• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer essa ação de jogo (mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Por favor descreva o problema de visualização. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. -
• Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.
I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v85
Histórico do relatório
Example:
BEFORE ADDING COALS TO SPOT ***:
Stn20
W10 W10
*** Str5 Str5 Str5
W20 W20 W20 W20 W20
i'd need a much more complex example to show why it would matter, but if the top 10 stones were falling four levels or so, you'd have a large range of places for things to end up, which could be useful in managing building regulations and triggering a curse at the end of the turn.
In the case you describe, the written rules are the actual problem - they are not clear enough on this point.
The idea is that you always check the pyramid from top to bottom, and in each row from left to right. The written rules state this explicitly for mayhem, but do not state it explicitly for the empty fall situation. In fact, they kinda miss the whole empty fall situation (where no bricks are under another one). Those situations are resolved first, but also from top to bottom, left to right - just like the BGA program does.
I will look at the rules and try to make it clearer.
Anyways, if you do not like this rule for you and your friends, you can always house rule your physical copy as much as you like. :-) To be honest: I hardly own any board game that I have not house ruled in some way.
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se tiver uma captura de ecrã/tela deste problema (boa prática), pode usar Imgur.com para carregá-la e copiar/colar o endereço aqui.
