#158361: "Mobile tap sequence: clicking a side pile THEN a card should not move that card to the side pile"
Sobre o que é este relatório?
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
O que aconteceu ? Por favor escolha abaixo
Por favor, cheque se já há um report com o mesmo assunto
Se sim, por favor, VOTE para este report. Reports com mais votos recebem PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrição detalhada
-
• Por favor copie e cole a mensagem de erro que aparece na tela, se possível.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• Por favor explique o que queria fazer, o que fez e o que aconteceu
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se você tiver uma captura de tela desse bug (boa prática), pode usar um serviço de hospedagem de imagens de sua escolha (por exemplo, snipboard.io) para enviá-la e copiar/colar o link aqui. Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• O que estava presente na tela quando você estava bloqueado (tela em branco? Parte da imagem do jogo? Mensagem de erro?)
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Que parte das regras não foi respeitada pela adaptação do BGA?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• A violação de regras está visível na revisão do jogo? Se sim, em que número de jogada?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Qual era a ação de jogo que queria fazer?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• O que você tentou fazer para provocar esta ação de jogo?
-
• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer isto(mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Em que passo do jogo ocorre o problema(qual era a instrução corrente do jogo)?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• O que aconteceu quando tentou fazer essa ação de jogo (mensagem de erro, mensagem na barra de estado do jogo)?
• Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Por favor descreva o problema de visualização. Se você tiver uma captura de tela desse bug (boa prática), pode usar um serviço de hospedagem de imagens de sua escolha (por exemplo, snipboard.io) para enviá-la e copiar/colar o link aqui.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Por favor copie/cole o texto em inglês em vez de sua língua. Se você tiver uma captura de tela desse bug (boa prática), pode usar um serviço de hospedagem de imagens de sua escolha (por exemplo, snipboard.io) para enviá-la e copiar/colar o link aqui. Este texto está disponível no sistema de traduções? Se sim, foi traduzido há mais de 24 horas?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Por favor, explique sua sugestão precisamente e de forma concisa, de forma que fique o mais fácil possível, entender o que você quer dizer.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Qual navegador você está usando?
Google Chrome v133
Histórico do relatório
Adicione alguma coisa para este relatório
- Outro ID de mesa / ID de jogada
- Carregar em F5 resolveu o problema?
- O problema aparece várias vezes? Sempre? Imprevisivelmente?
- Se você tiver uma captura de tela desse bug (boa prática), pode usar um serviço de hospedagem de imagens de sua escolha (por exemplo, snipboard.io) para enviá-la e copiar/colar o link aqui.
